Informal Logic 16 (3):147-157 (1994)
Abstract |
There are many radically different ways of understanding the distinction between linked and convergent arguments. This paper provides a generic model which enables one to articulate in a rigorous manner the important differences as well as the underlying similarities that exist between competing proposals. In addition, the paper offers a TRUE (Type Reduction Upon Elimination) test for distinguishing linked from convergent arguments which best captures the informal intuition that linked arguments are especially vulnerable to local criticisms pertaining to premise acceptability
|
Keywords | linked and convergent arguments, argument vulnerability, tinkering functions, zapped premise sets, logical support |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
A Critical Examination and Development of Wellman’s Theory of Conductive Argument.J. Blair & Dale Hample - unknown
View all 6 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Linkage: From Particulate to Interactive Genetics. [REVIEW]Raphael Falk - 2003 - Journal of the History of Biology 36 (1):87 - 117.
Bradley and the Impossibility of Absolute Truth.David Holdcroft - 1981 - History and Philosophy of Logic 2 (1-2):25-39.
The Importance of Linkage Arguments for the Theory and Practice of Human Rigths. A Response to James Nickel.Pablo Gilabert - 2010 - Human Rights Quarterly 32 (2):425-438.
Fighting Capitalism and Democracy.Erich Kofmel - 2008 - In Anti-Democratic Thought. Imprint Academic.
Natural Theology and Epistemic Justification.Sebastian Rehnman - 2010 - Heythrop Journal 51 (6):1017-1022.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2011-01-04
Total views
11 ( #790,505 of 2,401,549 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #551,447 of 2,401,549 )
2011-01-04
Total views
11 ( #790,505 of 2,401,549 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #551,447 of 2,401,549 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads