Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (1):18-21 (2019)

Clinical trials in emergency situations present unique challenges, because they involve enrolling individuals who lack capacity to consent in the context of acute illness or injury. The US Department of Health and Human Services and Food and Drug Administration regulations allowing an Exception from Informed Consent in these circumstances contain requirements for community consultation, public disclosure and restrictions on study risks and benefits. In this paper, we analyse an issue raised in the regulations that has received little attention or analysis but is ethically complex. This challenge is when to solicit and honour objections to EFIC trial enrolment, including from non-legally appointed representatives. We address novel questions involving whose objections should be honoured, what level of understanding is necessary for objections to be considered valid and how hard investigators should work to offer an opportunity to object. We present a set of criteria that provide conceptual and practical guidance. We argue that objections should be honoured if they undermine one of the key assumptions that allows for the permissibility of EFIC trials: that individuals would likely not object to enrolment based on their values or preferences. We then clarify the practical implications of this approach through examination of three cases of refusal in an EFIC study.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2017-104736
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,577
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Emergency Research Without Consent Under Polish Law.Joanna Różyńska & Marek Czarkowski - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):337-350.
Informed Consent in Emergency Research: A Contradiction in Terms.Malcolm G. Booth - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):351-359.
Empty Ethics: The Problem with Informed Consent.Oonagh Corrigan - 2003 - Sociology of Health & Illness 25 (3):768-792.
Informed Consent Doesn't Exist in AMI Trials.F. Verdu-Pascual - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):190-191.
Medical Research in Clinical Emergency Settings in Europe.S. Lotjonen - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):183-187.


Added to PP index

Total views
21 ( #512,434 of 2,446,603 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #456,908 of 2,446,603 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes