Eternal sentences

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 54 (1):14 – 23 (1976)
Abstract
The paper argues that two apparently attractive conceptions of an eternal sentence are defective. An alternative conception is presented which the authors think allows greater insight into the nature of semantic concepts.
Keywords Quine  eternal sentence
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00048407612341011
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,317
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Indexical Expressions.Yehoshua Bar-Hillel - 1954 - Mind 63 (251):359-379.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A Tense Logic for Boethius.John N. Martin - 1989 - History and Philosophy of Logic 10 (2):203-212.
What’s So Special About Sentences?Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward - 1995 - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 28 (4):409-25.
Eternal Recurrence and the Categorical Imperative.Philip J. Kain - 2007 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (1):105-116.
Editorial: Time & Experience: Twins of the Eternal Now?Gregory M. Nixon - 2010 - Journal of Consciousness Exploration and Research 1 (5):482-489.
Change and the Eternal Part of the Mind in Spinoza.Michael Lebuffe - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):369-384.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
15 ( #354,242 of 2,224,469 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #423,227 of 2,224,469 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature