Cognitive Science 35 (1):34-78 (2011)
AbstractDebates concerning the types of representations that aid reading acquisition have often been influenced by the relationship between measures of early phonological awareness (the ability to process speech sounds) and later reading ability. Here, a complementary approach is explored, analyzing how the functional utility of different representational units, such as whole words, bodies (letters representing the vowel and final consonants of a syllable), and graphemes (letters representing a phoneme) may change as the number of words that can be read gradually increases. Utility is measured by applying a Simplicity Principle to the problem of mapping from print to sound; that is, assuming that the “best” representational units for reading are those which allow the mapping from print to sounds to be encoded as efficiently as possible. Results indicate that when only a small number of words are read whole-word representations are most useful, whereas when many words can be read graphemic representations have the highest utility
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
A Mathematical Theory of Communication.Claude E. Shannon - 1948 - Bell System Technical Journal 27:379–423.
Understanding Normal and Impaired Word Reading: Computational Principles in Quasi-Regular Domains.David C. Plaut, James L. McClelland, Mark S. Seidenberg & Karalyn Patterson - 1996 - Psychological Review 103 (1):56-115.
Models of Reading Aloud: Dual-Route and Parallel-Distributed-Processing Approaches.Max Coltheart, Brent Curtis, Paul Atkins & Micheal Haller - 1993 - Psychological Review 100 (4):589-608.
Simplicity: A Unifying Principle in Cognitive Science?Nick Chater & Paul Vitányi - 2003 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (1):19-22.
Citations of this work
Language Learning From Positive Evidence, Reconsidered: A Simplicity-Based Approach.Anne S. Hsu, Nick Chater & Paul Vitányi - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (1):35-55.
Similar books and articles
A Computational and Empirical Investigation of Graphemes in Reading.Conrad Perry, Johannes C. Ziegler & Marco Zorzi - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (5):800-828.
The Modulation of Visual and Task Characteristics of a Writing System on Hemispheric Lateralization in Visual Word Recognition—A Computational Exploration.Janet H. Hsiao & Sze Man Lam - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (5):861-890.
Using Reinforcement Learning to Examine Dynamic Attention Allocation During Reading.Yanping Liu, Erik D. Reichle & Ding-Guo Gao - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (8):1507-1540.
Hemisphere Differences in Conscious and Unconscious Word Reading.Jillian H. Fecteau, Alan Kingstone & James T. Enns - 2004 - Consciousness and Cognition 13 (3):550-64.
Thoughtwriting—in Poetry and Music.Kendall Walton - 2011/2015 - In Kendall L. Walton (ed.), In Other Shoes: Music, Metaphor, Empathy, Existence. Oxford University Press. pp. 54-74.
Back to the Future: An Historical Perspective on the Pendulum-Like Changes in Literacy.Oren Soffer & Yoram Eshet-Alkalai - 2009 - Minds and Machines 19 (1):47-59.
Hume's Reading of the Classics at Ninewells, 1749–51.Moritz Baumstark - 2010 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 8 (1):63-77.
Offline Improvement in Learning to Read a Novel Orthography Depends on Direct Letter Instruction.Tali Bitan & James R. Booth - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (5):896-918.
Reading with Understanding: Interpretive Method in Chinese Philosophy.Chad Hansen - 2005 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 4 (2):341-346.
Reading Derrida Reading Heidegger Reading Nietzsche.Alan D. Schrift - 1984 - Research in Phenomenology 14 (1):87-119.