Contemporary Buddhism 16 (2):299-329 (2015)

Authors
Abstract
This article considers the recent debate over the nature of Buddhist ethics largely conducted by scholars who have argued in different ways that Buddhist ethics may be assimilated to or may correspond with different forms of western ethical theory.I argue that the interpretation of Buddhist texts, and in particular the Vinaya, in light of western ethical theory creates misunderstanding. I argue that in each case of a supposed ethical dilemma, Buddhist ethics should be seen as empirical, since the ultimate point of reference for the choices involved in a proposed action lies in the purity and wholesomeness of each individual action.My approach follows Foucault's argument for scepticism with regard to the notions of a universal nature or of a universal rationality. I argue that it is not instructive to read Buddhist texts against generalized standards. Rather, it is more productive to regard ethics as creating a space for the ethical, not in a normative sense but one arising from personal practice as related to individual circumstances.At the same time, this article outlines the role of beauty and its role in ethical formation. I suggest that one interpretation of Theravada Buddhism has regarded beauty as a form of sensuous pleasure, which is seen as a danger for someone on the spiritual path. However, an alternative reading of such texts is more sympathetic to the educative role of beauty.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/14639947.2015.1020735
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,355
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Kant’s Ethical Thought.Allen W. Wood - 1999 - Cambridge University Press.
Moral Particularism.Brad Hooker & Margaret Olivia Little (eds.) - 2000 - Oxford University Press.

View all 86 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Michel Foucault.Neil Levy - 2004 - Foucault Studies:20-31.
The Aesthetics of Existence in the Work of Michel Foucault.Marli Huijer - 1999 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (2):61-85.
Michel Foucault: Ética de la Palabra y Vida Académica.Jorge Dávila - 2007 - Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana 12 (39):107-132.
Review. [REVIEW]André Berten - 1993 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain 91:704-705.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-09-02

Total views
25 ( #458,145 of 2,519,513 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,513 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes