Genetic engineering and our duties to laboratory animals: a theoretical and empirical analysis of the concepts of intrinsic value and animal integrity


Authors
Rob De Vries
University of Amsterdam
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,058
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Genetic Engineering and the Integrity of Animals.Rob De Vries - 2006 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (5):469-493.
The Concept of Intrinsic Value and Transgenic Animals.H. Verhoog - 1992 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5 (2):147-160.
Animals, Politics, and Morality.Robert Garner - 2004 - Distributed Exclusively in the Usa by Palgrave.
Duties to Companion Animals.Steve Cooke - 2011 - Res Publica 17 (3):261-274.
Undermining Indirect Duty Theories.Robert Bass - 2006 - Between the Species (6):1.
Standards for Animal Research: Looking at the Middle.Rebecca Dresser - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):123-143.
Seeking Perfection: A Kantian Look at Human Genetic Engineering.Martin Gunderson - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (2):87-102.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-13

Total views
11 ( #807,459 of 2,427,678 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #521,211 of 2,427,678 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes