Abstract
In several recent papers Arthur Robson sketches evolutionary scenarios in order to explain why we humans evolved hard-wired utility functions and the capacity to choose flexibly on the basis of them. Thesescenarios are scrutinized minutely in the paper. It is pointed out that Robson ignores several relevant insightful ideas and distinctions that have surfaced in other contemporary evolutionary theorizing. A somewhat different picture of human behavior emerges once these ideas and distinctions are taken seriously.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Philosophy of Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0495-4548
DOI theoria20031835
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,363
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Dilthey on the Unity of Science.Nabeel Hamid - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (4):635-656.
Science and Human Nature.Richard Samuels - 2012 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 70:1-28.
Ethics, Hermeneutics, and Eudaimonics.Phillip Honenberger - 2010 - International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (2):243-256.
Design, Development and Decisions.P. Bateson - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (4):635-646.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-01-11

Total views
5 ( #1,167,906 of 2,445,401 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,259 of 2,445,401 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes