Reform retractions to make them more transparent

Nature 582 (7811):149 (2020)

Abstract

The scientific community should agree on the essential information to be provided when pulling a paper from the scientific literature. Nature 582, 149 (2020); doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01694-x

Download options

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-11

Downloads
363 (#29,367)

6 months
78 (#9,376)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Quan-Hoang Vuong
Phenikaa University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Similar books and articles

Retractions: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.Quan-Hoang Vuong - 2020 - LSE Impact of Social Sciences 2020 (2):1-4.
Communication scientifique : pour le meilleur et le PEER.Laurent Romary - 2010 - Hermès: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 57 (2):131.
Empirical Developments in Retraction.B. K. Redman, H. N. Yarandi & J. F. Merz - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):807-809.
Retractions Data Mining #1.Quan-Hoang Vuong & Viet-Phuong La - 2019 - Open Science Framework 2019 (2):1-3.
Oldenburg and the Art of Scientific Communication.Marie Boas Hall - 1965 - British Journal for the History of Science 2 (4):277-290.
Attention and the Art of Scientific Publishing.Arjo Klamer & Hendrik P. Van Dalen - 2002 - Journal of Economic Methodology 9 (3):289-315.