Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (1):73-87 (2008)
In order to design and implement electronic institutions that incorporate norms governing the behavior of the participants of those institutions, some crucial steps should be taken. The first problem is that human norms are (on purpose) specified on an abstract level. This ensures applicability of the norms over long periods of time in many different circumstances. However, for an electronic institution to function according to those norms, they should be concrete enough to be able to check them run time. A second problem is that norms describe which behavior is desirable and permitted, but not how this is achieved in an institution. In the “real world" regulations often indicate procedures for implementing and enforcing the law. Likewise we should devise means to annotate the norms with practical aspects such as enforcement mechanisms, sanctions, etc. in order to get requirements for an institution that will enforce norms (by either constraining behavior within the norms or reacting to violation of the norms). The choice of which kind of mechanism is chosen is not a normative one, but usually based on criteria of efficiency and/or feasibility of the mechanism. In this paper we present our view on how to approach these problems and other related issues to be solved in order to develop e-institutions capable to operate in complex, highly regulated scenarios.
|Keywords||Multi agent systems Electronic institutions Norms Norm enforcement|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Normative Systems.D. G. Londey, Carlos E. Alchourron & Eugenio Bulygin - 1973 - Philosophical Quarterly 23 (92):280.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Norms, Preferences, and Conditional Behavior.C. Bicchieri - 2010 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (3):297-313.
A Framework for the Psychology of Norms.Chandra Sripada & Stephen Stich - 2006 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen P. Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind, Volume 2: Culture and Cognition. Oxford University Press.
Understanding Norms Without a Theory of Mind.Kristin Andrews - 2009 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 52 (5):433-448.
Closing the Gap Between Ideal and Real Behavior: Scientific Vs. Engineering Approaches to Normativity.Sergei Gepshtein - 2009 - Philosophical Psychology 22 (1):61 – 75.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #270,543 of 2,169,723 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,460 of 2,169,723 )
How can I increase my downloads?