Predatory publishing and beall’s list: Lessons for the countries adapting novel research evaluation criteria

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.24195/2414-4665-2017-8-5
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,599
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Predatory Journals Spamming for Publications: What Should Researchers Do?Aamir Memon - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5):1617-1639.
Unethical Practices in Scholarly, Open-Access Publishing.Jeffrey Beall - 2013 - Journal of Information Ethics 22 (1):11-20.
End of 2016: Can We Save Research From Predators in 2017?Aamir Memon - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1339-1345.
Criteria and Evaluation of Cognitive Theories.Petros A. M. Gelepithis - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):607-609.
Fake Journals: Not Always Valid Ways to Distinguish Them.Khaled Moustafa - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (5):1391-1392.
Relevance, Acceptability, and Sufficiency Today.J. Blair - 2007 - Anthropology and Philosophy 8 (1/2):33-48.
Whither Thou Goest, Philosophy of Education ….Matthew J. Hayden - 2014 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 33 (6):667-672.


Added to PP index

Total views
8 ( #865,849 of 2,280,598 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #835,594 of 2,280,598 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature