Hobbes Studies 30 (2):178-201 (2017)

Authors
Douglas Wadle
University of Southern California
Abstract
In _Leviathan_, Hobbes embraces three seemingly inconsistent claims: (i) the unity of a multitude is secured only by the unity of its representer, (ii) assemblies can represent other multitudes, and (iii) assemblies are, or are constituted by, multitudes. Together these claims require that a representative assembly, itself, be represented. If that representer is another assembly, it too will need a unifying representer, and so on. To stop a regress, we will need an already unified representer. But a multitude can only speak or act through its representer, and an assembly is a multitude, so any representing done by the assembly is actually done by this already unified, regress-stopping representer. That is, if (i) and (iii) are true, (ii) cannot be. I will argue that this inconsistency is only apparent and that we can resolve it without rejecting any of these three claims. We do this by appealing to a representer-as-decision-procedure meeting certain criteria. Such a procedural representer breaks the transitivity of representation such that the assembly it represents can properly represent some further multitude. I proceed in my defense of the procedural representer view by addressing a series of problems it faces, the solutions to which give us a progressively clearer picture of the criteria this representer must meet.
Keywords Hobbes   Leviathan   assemblies   representation  personhood
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/18750257-03002003
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Hobbes on Representation.Quentin Skinner - 2005 - European Journal of Philosophy 13 (2):155-184.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hobbes and Corneille on Political Representation.Annabel Herzog - 2009 - The European Legacy 14 (4):379-389.
Hobbes's Concept of Multitude.Omar Astorga - 2011 - Hobbes Studies 24 (1):5-14.
That Giant Monster Call’D a Multitude.Jacob Tootalian - 2017 - Hobbes Studies 30 (2):223-235.
Multitude.Ericka Tucker - 2015 - In Andre Santos Campos (ed.), Spinoza: Basic Concepts. Imprint Academic. pp. 129-141.
A Very British Hobbes, or A More European Hobbes?Patricia Springborg - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (2):368-386.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-10-25

Total views
90 ( #116,324 of 2,439,384 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #32,178 of 2,439,384 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes