Hobbes Studies 30 (2):178-201 (2017)
AbstractIn _Leviathan_, Hobbes embraces three seemingly inconsistent claims: (i) the unity of a multitude is secured only by the unity of its representer, (ii) assemblies can represent other multitudes, and (iii) assemblies are, or are constituted by, multitudes. Together these claims require that a representative assembly, itself, be represented. If that representer is another assembly, it too will need a unifying representer, and so on. To stop a regress, we will need an already unified representer. But a multitude can only speak or act through its representer, and an assembly is a multitude, so any representing done by the assembly is actually done by this already unified, regress-stopping representer. That is, if (i) and (iii) are true, (ii) cannot be. I will argue that this inconsistency is only apparent and that we can resolve it without rejecting any of these three claims. We do this by appealing to a representer-as-decision-procedure meeting certain criteria. Such a procedural representer breaks the transitivity of representation such that the assembly it represents can properly represent some further multitude. I proceed in my defense of the procedural representer view by addressing a series of problems it faces, the solutions to which give us a progressively clearer picture of the criteria this representer must meet.
Similar books and articles
Hobbes and Corneille on Political Representation.Annabel Herzog - 2009 - The European Legacy 14 (4):379-389.
Hobbes Smashes Cromwell and the Rump: An Interpretation of Leviathan.Monicka Patterson-Tutschka - 2015 - Political Theory 43 (5):631-656.
Elusive Unity: The General Will in Hobbes and Kant.Katrin Flikschuh - 2012 - Hobbes Studies 25 (1):21-42.
Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Hobbes and Leviathan.Glen Newey - 2005 - Routledge.
The Grounds Of The Political Representation In Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan / Le Fondement De La Representation Politique Dans Le Leviathan De Thomas Hobbes.Laura Ilinescu - 2009 - Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai Philosophia 1.
The Place of Interests in Hobbes’s Civil Science.Elliott Karstadt - 2016 - Hobbes Studies 29 (2):105-128.
Multitude.Ericka Tucker - 2015 - In Andre Santos Campos (ed.), Spinoza: Basic Concepts. Imprint Academic. pp. 129-141.
Argument and Unity in the Political and Moral Teachings of Thomas Hobbes's "Leviathan".Charles Malcolm Schofield - 1985 - Dissertation, University of Missouri - Columbia
Leviathan, Parts I and Ii - Revised Edition.A. P. Martinich & Brian Battiste (eds.) - 2010 - Broadview Press.
A Very British Hobbes, or A More European Hobbes?Patricia Springborg - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (2):368-386.
Leviathan: Or the Matter, Forme, & Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civill.Ian Shapiro (ed.) - 2010 - Yale University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads