Human Studies 32 (2):241-250 (2009)

In What Things Do , Verbeek (What things do: philosophical reflections on technology, agency and design. Penn State University Press, University Park, 2005a ) develops a vocabulary for understanding the social role of technological artifacts in our culture and in our daily lives. He understands this role in terms of the technological mediation of human behavior and perception. To explain mediation, he levels out the modernist separation of subjects and objects by decreasing the autonomy of humans and increasing the activity of things. His approach consists primarily within a clever integration of the theories of Latour and Ihde, which provides a comprehensive understanding of the social role of technological artifacts. Despite the fact that Verbeek’s book is carefully thought out and already quite influential in the field of philosophy of technology, his approach raises some conceptual and pragmatic questions. The conceptual questions concern (a) the precise meaning of the concept of mediation and the possibility of distinguishing between different forms of mediation, and (b) the differences and similarities between human and technological agency and intentionality. The pragmatic questions concern the application of his theory to the realm of engineering ethics. Particularly pressing is the question of how to assign (moral) responsibility to humans when technological artifacts are mediating the outcomes of human actions. With this article, I will raise these issues, and look forward to Verbeek’s reply.
Keywords Mediation  Technological agency  Responsibility
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10746-009-9117-1
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,199
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

We Have Never Been Modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Harvard University Press.
Pandora’s Hope.Bruno Latour - 1998 - Harvard University Press.
On the Morality of Artificial Agents.Luciano Floridi & J. W. Sanders - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (3):349-379.
On Technical Mediation.Bruno Latour - 1994 - Common Knowledge 3 (2):29-64.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

How Artefacts Influence Our Actions.Auke J. K. Pols - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3):575-587.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Technological Delegation: Responsibility for the Unintended.Katinka Waelbers - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):51-68.
Three Schools of Thought on Freedom in Liberal, Technological Societies.Katinka Waelbers & Adam Briggle - 2010 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 14 (3):176-193.
Designing with Evolving Systems.John Broadbent - 2003 - World Futures 59 (8):631 – 637.
Designing Design and Designing Media.Jurgen Faust - 2010 - Technoetic Arts 8 (1):109-114.
Collectives' Duties and Collectivisation Duties.Stephanie Collins - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (2):231-248.
Can Technological Artefacts Be Moral Agents?Martin Peterson - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):411-424.


Added to PP index

Total views
43 ( #265,152 of 2,517,928 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #409,045 of 2,517,928 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes