Argumentation 25 (2):271-274 (2011)

Authors
Jean H.M. Wagemans
University of Amsterdam
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10503-011-9204-0
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,973
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Defending Copernicus and Galileo.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 2010 - Review of Metaphysics 64 (1):75-103.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Defending Copernicus and Galileo.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 2010 - Review of Metaphysics 64 (1):75-103.
Methodological Judgment and Critical Reasoning in Galileo's Dialogue.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:248 - 257.
Galileo, Rationality and Explanation.Joseph C. Pitt - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (1):87-103.
Wallace on Galileo's Sources.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1985 - Review of Metaphysics 39 (2):335 - 344.
Review: Philosophising About Galileo. [REVIEW]Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1975 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (3):255 - 264.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-04-14

Total views
62 ( #152,189 of 2,344,032 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #240,017 of 2,344,032 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes