The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion

Argumentation 25 (3):329-339 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this contribution, I will develop a comprehensive tool for the reconstruction and evaluation of argumentation from expert opinion. This is done by analyzing and then combining two dialectical accounts of this type of argumentation. Walton’s account of the ‘appeal to expert opinion’ provides a number of useful, but fairly unsystematic suggestions for critical questions pertaining to argumentation from expert opinion. The pragma-dialectical account of ‘argumentation from authority’ offers a clear and systematic, but fairly general framework for the reconstruction and evaluation of this type of argumentation. The tool is developed by incorporating Walton’s critical questions into a pragma-dialectical framework.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,635

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is There a Burden of Questioning?Douglas Walton - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (1):1-43.
Analogy Argumentation in Law: A Dialectical Perspective. [REVIEW]Harm Kloosterhuis - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):173-187.
Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science.Roger M. Cooke (ed.) - 1991 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-07-25

Downloads
61 (#193,106)

6 months
4 (#172,750)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jean H.M. Wagemans
University of Amsterdam