The Linguistic Turn and Other Misconceptions About Analytic Philosophy

Abstract

Some common notions about analytic philosophy - that it is uniformly anti-metaphysical or indifferent to the history of philosophy - are clearly misconceived. However the impression that analytic philosophers are essentially linguistic philosophers is not entirely false and hence less easy to refute

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Analytic philosophy and history of philosophy.Tom Sorell & Graham Alan John Rogers (eds.) - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Past the Linguistic Turn?Timothy Williamson - 2004 - In Brian Leiter (ed.), The Future for Philosophy. Clarendon Press.
Must we argue?Mark T. Nelson - 2004 - The Philosophers' Magazine 26 (26):41-42.
Logic and Metaphysics in Early Analytic Philosophy.Michael Beaney - 2012 - In Lila Haaparanta & Heikki Koskinen (eds.), Categories of Being: Essays on Metaphysics and Logic. Oxford University Press, Usa. pp. 257.
Děláme světy jazykem?Jaroslav Peregrin - 1998 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 6:40-48.
Analytic feminism.Ann Garry - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-02-14

Downloads
17 (#891,762)

6 months
3 (#1,037,180)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pierre Wagner
University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references