The Arnauld-Malebranche Controversy and Descartes’ Ideas

The Monist 71 (4):560-572 (1988)
Authors
Russell Wahl
Idaho State University
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI monist198871442
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,562
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Arnauld's God.Steven Nadler - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):pp. 517-538.
Arnauld and the Cartesian Philosophy of Ideas.Steven M. Nadler - 1989 - Philosophical Review 101 (3):644-647.
Existential Import in Cartesian Semantics.John N. Martin - 2011 - History and Philosophy of Logic 32 (3):211-239.
Occasionalism in the Malebranche-Arnauld Debate.Andrew Gerard Black - 1992 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Arnauld's Verbal Distinction Between Ideas and Perceptions.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2016 - History and Philosophy of Logic 37 (4):375-390.
Material Falsity in Descartes, Arnauld, and Suarez.Norman J. Wells - 1984 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (1):25-50.
Leibniz and Malebranche on Innate Ideas.Nicholas Jolley - 1988 - Philosophical Review 97 (1):71-91.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-15

Total downloads
3 ( #817,437 of 2,268,307 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #373,235 of 2,268,307 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature