Hidden Assumptions in the Dutch Book Argument

Theory and Decision 43 (3):293-312 (1997)
Abstract
Probabilistic theories of rationality claim that degrees of belief have to satisfy the probability axioms in order to be rational. A standard argument to support this claim is the Dutch Book argument. This paper tries to show that, in spite of its popularity, the Dutch Book argument does not provide a foundation for normative theories of rationality. After a presentation of the argument and some of its criticisms a problem is pointed out: the Dutch Book argument applies only to situations with a specific formal structure. Several attempts to justify the argument for more general situations are considered and rejected. The only way to remedy the shortcoming, it is argued, seems to be the acceptance of a far-reaching and highly implausible empirical hypothesis
Keywords Dutch Book argument  degree of belief  probability  coherence  probabilistic theories of rationality
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1004996226545
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,658
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Arguments for-or Against-Probabilism?A. Hajek - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):793-819.
Scotching Dutch Books?Alan Hajek - 2005 - Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1):139-151.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Dutch Book Arguments and Consistency.Colin Howson - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:161 - 168.
Arguments for–or Against–Probabilism?Alan Hájek - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):793 - 819.
Is There a Dutch Book Argument for Probability Kinematics?Brad Armendt - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (4):583-588.
Dutch Books and Agent Rationality.Daniel Silber - 1999 - Theory and Decision 47 (3):247-266.
Beauty and the Bets.Christopher Hitchcock - 2004 - Synthese 139 (3):405 - 420.
Scotching the Dutch Book Argument.Peter Milne - 1990 - Erkenntnis 32 (1):105--26.
Dutch Books, Additivity, and Utility Theory.Brad Armendt - 1993 - Philosophical Topics 21 (1):1-20.
Implications of the Dutch Book: Following Ramsey’s Axioms.Wei Xiong - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (2):334-344.
Begging the Question and Bayesians.Brian Weatherson - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30:687-697.
Countable Additivity and the de Finetti Lottery.Paul Bartha - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):301-321.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-02

Total downloads

42 ( #123,489 of 2,169,652 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #82,217 of 2,169,652 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums