International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (3):285 – 307 (2006)
Evidence for instances of astrophysical 'fine tuning' (or 'coincidences') is thought by some to lend support to the design argument (i.e. the argument that our universe has been designed by some deity). We assess some of the relevant empirical and conceptual issues. We argue that astrophysical fine tuning calls for some explanation, but this explanation need not appeal to the design argument. A clear and strict separation of the issue of anthropic fine tuning on one hand and any form of Eddingtonian numerology and teleology on the other, may help clarify arguably the most significant issue in the philosophy of cosmology.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Multiple Universes and the Fine-Tuning Argument: A Response to Rodney Holder.Michael Rota - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):556–576.
Weisberg on Design: What Fine-Tuning's Got to Do with It.Darren Bradley - 2012 - Erkenntnis 77 (3):435-438.
Firing Squads and Fine-Tuning: Sober on the Design Argument.Jonathan Weisberg - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):809-821.
Fine-Tuning and the Infrared Bull's-Eye.John Roberts - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (2):287-303.
What Fine-Tuning's Got to Do with It: A Reply to Weisberg.R. White - 2011 - Analysis 71 (4):676-679.
Anthropic Reasoning and the Contemporary Design Argument in Astrophysics: A Reply to Robert Klee.Mark Walker & Milan Cirkovic - unknown
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads260 ( #12,807 of 2,168,640 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #187,136 of 2,168,640 )
How can I increase my downloads?