Astrophysical fine tuning, naturalism, and the contemporary design argument

Authors
Mark Walker
New Mexico State University
Abstract
Evidence for instances of astrophysical 'fine tuning' (or 'coincidences') is thought by some to lend support to the design argument (i.e. the argument that our universe has been designed by some deity). We assess some of the relevant empirical and conceptual issues. We argue that astrophysical fine tuning calls for some explanation, but this explanation need not appeal to the design argument. A clear and strict separation of the issue of anthropic fine tuning on one hand and any form of Eddingtonian numerology and teleology on the other, may help clarify arguably the most significant issue in the philosophy of cosmology.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02698590600960945
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,167
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophical Explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Harvard University Press.
The Emperor's New Mind.Roger Penrose - 1989 - Oxford University Press.
The Anthropic Cosmological Principle.John D. Barrow - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
Darwin's Dangerous Idea.Daniel C. Dennett - 1996 - Behavior and Philosophy 24 (2):169-174.
Philosophical Explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Crítica: Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 14 (41):87-93.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
263 ( #15,999 of 2,242,260 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #231,807 of 2,242,260 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature