Against Hypothetical Syllogism

Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (5):979-997 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The debate over Hypothetical Syllogism is locked in stalemate. Although putative natural language counterexamples to Hypothetical Syllogism abound, many philosophers defend Hypothetical Syllogism, arguing that the alleged counterexamples involve an illicit shift in context. The proper lesson to draw from the putative counterexamples, they argue, is that natural language conditionals are context-sensitive conditionals which obey Hypothetical Syllogism. In order to make progress on the issue, I consider and improve upon Morreau’s proof of the invalidity of Hypothetical Syllogism. The improved proof relies upon the semantic claim that conditionals with antecedents irrelevant to the obtaining of an already true consequent are themselves true. Moreover, this semantic insight allows us to provide compelling counterexamples to Hypothetical Syllogism that are resistant to the usual contextualist response

Similar books and articles

Why Hypothetical Syllogism is Invalid for Indicative Conditionals.Moti Mizrahi - 2013 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):40-43.
Logic, History of: Ancient Logic.Susanne Bobzien - 2006 - In Donald M. Borchert (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Thomson Gale.
The pure hypothetical syllogism and entailment.D. L. C. Maclachlan - 1970 - Philosophical Quarterly 20 (78):26-40.
Counterfactuals and context.Berit Brogaard & Joe Salerno - 2008 - Analysis 68 (1):39–46.
On the syllogism.Augustus De Morgan - 1966 - New Haven,: Yale University Press. Edited by Peter Heath.


Added to PP

1,137 (#11,287)

6 months
149 (#23,513)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lee Walters
University of Southampton

References found in this work

Counterfactuals.David K. Lewis - 1973 - Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Philosophical explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
The Philosophy of Philosophy.Timothy Williamson - 2007 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Inquiry.Robert C. Stalnaker - 1984 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 53 references / Add more references