Arguer's Position: A Pragmatic Study of Ad Hominem Attack, Criticism, Refutation, and Fallacy

Philosophy and Rhetoric 20 (1):63-65 (1987)

Authors
Douglas Walton
University of Windsor
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,232
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Very Idea of Epistemology.Donald McCloskey - 1989 - Economics and Philosophy 5 (1):1.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Poisoning the Well.Douglas Walton - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):273-307.
Lightening Up on the Ad Hominem.John Woods - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):109-134.
Equivocating the Ad Hominem.Daniel Putman - 2010 - Philosophy 85 (4):551-555.
Ad Hominem Fallacies, Bias, and Testimony.Audrey Yap - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):97-109.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-21

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes