Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments From Authority

Pennsylvania State University Press (1997)

Douglas Walton
University of Windsor
A new pragmatic approach, based on the latest developments in argumentation theory, analyzing appeal to expert opinion as a form of argument. Reliance on authority has always been a common recourse in argumentation, perhaps never more so than today in our highly technological society when knowledge has become so specialized—as manifested, for instance, in the frequent appearance of "expert witnesses" in courtrooms. When is an appeal to the opinion of an expert a reasonable type of argument to make, and when does it become a fallacy? This book provides a method for the evaluation of these appeals in everyday argumentation. Specialized domains of knowledge such as science, medicine, law, and government policy have gradually taken over as the basis on which many of our rational decisions are made daily. Consequently, appeal to expert opinion in these areas has become a powerful type of argument. Challenging an argument based on expert scientific opinion, for example, has become as difficult as it once was to question religious authority. Walton stresses that even in cases where expert opinion is divided, the effect of it can still be so powerful that it overwhelms an individual's ability to make a decision based on personal deliberation of what is right or wrong in a given situation. The book identifies the requirements that make an appeal to expert opinion a reasonable or unreasonable argument. Walton's new pragmatic approach analyzes that appeal as a distinctive form of argument, with an accompanying set of appropriate critical questions matching the form. Throughout the book, a historical survey of the key developments in the evolution of the argument from authority, dating from the time of the ancients, is given, and new light is shed on current problems of "junk science" and battles between experts in legal argumentation.
Keywords Reasoning   Authority   Fallacies
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy this book Find it on
ISBN(s) 9780271016955     0271016949 (cloth : alk. paper)   0271016957
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,199
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Fake News: A Definition.Axel Gelfert - 2018 - Informal Logic 38 (1):84-117.

View all 67 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Douglas Walton, Appeal to Expert Opinion– Arguments From Authority.Ronald Leenes - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):277-281.
On a Razor's Edge: Evaluating Arguments From Expert Opinion.Douglas Walton - 2014 - Argument and Computation 5 (2-3):139-159.


Added to PP index

Total views
1 ( #1,461,248 of 2,412,348 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #538,625 of 2,412,348 )

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes