Common morality and moral reform

Abstract
The idea of moral reform requires that morality be more than a description of what people do value, for there has to be some measure against which to assess progress. Otherwise, any change is not reform, but simply difference. Therefore, I discuss moral reform in relation to two prescriptive approaches to common morality, which I distinguish as the foundational and the pragmatic. A foundational approach to common morality (e.g., Bernard Gert’s) suggests that there is no reform of morality , but of beliefs, values, customs, and practices so as to conform with an unchanging, foundational morality. If, however, there were revision in its foundation (e.g., in rationality), then reform in morality itself would be possible. On a pragmatic view, on the other hand, common morality is relative to human flourishing, and its justification consists in its effectiveness in promoting flourishing. Morality is dependent on what in fact does promote human flourishing and therefore, could be reformed. However, a pragmatic approach, which appears more open to the possibility of moral reform, would need a more robust account of norms by which reform is measured.
Keywords Morality  Common morality  Moral reform  Gert  Beauchamp  Childress  Foundational  Pragmatic  Pragmatism  Ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11017-009-9096-2
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,871
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory.Alasdair C. MacIntyre - 2007 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
Whose Justice? Which Rationality?Alasdair MacIntyre - 1988 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Morality: Its Nature and Justification.Bernard Gert - 1998 - Oxford University Press.
Common Morality: Deciding What to Do.Bernard Gert - 2004 - Oxford University Press.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Justifying Group-Specific Common Morality.Carson Strong - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):1-15.
The Hedgehog and the Borg: Common Morality in Bioethics.John D. Arras - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):11-30.
Common Morality: Deciding What to Do.Bernard Gert - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
A Defense of the Common Morality.Tom L. Beauchamp - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (3):259-274.
Common Morality: Comment on Beauchamp and Childress.Oliver Rauprich - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):43-71.
Common Morality and Computing.Bernard Gert - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):53-60.
Added to PP index
2009-02-14

Total downloads
73 ( #81,741 of 2,231,916 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #191,075 of 2,231,916 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature