Developing effective ethics for effective behavior

Social Responsibility Journal 6 (4):536-550 (2010)
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the internal structure of Gandhi's ethics as a way to determine opportunities for improving that system's ability to influence behavior. In this paper, the author aims to work under the idea that a system of ethics is a guide for social responsibility. Design/methodology/approach – The data source is Gandhi's set of ethics as described by Naess. These simple (primarily quantitative) studies compare the concepts within the code of ethics, and their relationships to one another. Findings – Gandhi's ethics are robust at the 0.25 level (the scale is zero to one – zero is lowest). This is consistent with theories of the social sciences (that do not work well in practice). Gandhi's success might be ascribed to his leadership ability. Research limitations/implications – Some suggest this approach is reductionist because of its superficial similarity to approaches of physical science. The implications for research are profound. First, this approach provides an objective method for comparing (and so, advancing) systems of ethics. Second, this paper suggests the opportunity to compare the internal structure of ethics with “external” aspects – the implementation of ethical systems. Practical implications – By itself, Gandhi's system of ethics cannot be reliably applied in practice - it cannot be expected to change behavior more than any other system of ethics. This raises concerns about other ethical codes as well. The practical implications of the form of analysis presented in this paper are immense because it provides a way for practitioners to objectively compare two codes of ethics and determine which one will be more effective. Originality/value – The approach documented in the paper has never been applied to the field of ethics. It is unique in that it addresses the “internal” structure of a system of ethics (compared to the “external”, or application, of ethical systems).
Keywords metaethics  ethics  corporate social responsibility
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,349
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Role of Ethics in 21st Century Organizations.William H. Bishop - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 118 (3):635-637.
The Science of Conceptual Systems: A Progress Report.E. Wallis Steven - 2016 - Foundations of Science 21 (4):579-602.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Is It Ethical to Use Ethics as Strategy?Bryan W. Husted & David B. Allen - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):21 - 31.
The Effectiveness of Corporate Codes of Ethics.Steven Weller - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (5):389 - 395.
How Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics Are Perceived in China.Jiyun Wu & Kirk Davidson - 2010 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 21:23-31.
Regulating Corporate Social Performance.David Hess - 2001 - Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (2):307-330.
A Code of Ethics for Corporatecode of Ethics.Mark S. Schwartz - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 41 (1-2):27 - 43.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
16 ( #305,991 of 2,193,746 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #145,875 of 2,193,746 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature