Journal of Pragmatics 106:20-38 (2016)
AbstractThis article is concerned with how we make decisions based on how problems are presented to us and the effect that the framing of the problem might have on our choices. Current philosophical and psychological accounts of the framing effect in experiments such as the Asian Disease Problem concern reference points and domains. We question the importance of reference points and domains. Instead, we adopt a linguistic perspective focussing on the role of the evaluative polarity evoked by the words - negativeand positive - used to describe the options in the decision problem. We show that the evaluative polarity of the different wordings in the ADP better explain participants’ behaviour than reference points and domains. We propose two models in which the values given to evaluative polarity words directly influence the strength of framing. The results indicate that linguistic considerations regarding evaluative polarity have to be considered in relation to the ADP. The account resembles Fuzzy-Trace-Theory but allows for thestrength of evaluative polarity to directly affect behaviour. In the discussion, we also assess how evaluative polarity relates to negation, antonyms and the communicative frame within which the choices are presented.
Similar books and articles
The Normativity of Evaluative Concepts.Christine Tappolet - 2014 - In Anne Reboul (ed.), Mind, Values, and Metaphysics. Philosophical Essays in Honor of Kevin Mulligan, Volume 2. pp. 39-54.
Polarität: Ihre Bedeutung Für Die Philosophie der Modernen Physik, Biologie Und Psychologie.Walter Bloch - 1972
Negative Contexts: Collocation, Polarity and Multiple Negation.Ton van der Wouden - 1997 - Routledge.
What is evaluative normativity, that we (maybe) should avoid it?Jonathan M. Weinberg - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):274-275.
Does sunshine prime loyal … or summer? Effects of associative relatedness on the evaluative priming effect in the valent/neutral categorisation task.Benedikt Werner, Elisabeth von Ramin, Adriaan Spruyt & Klaus Rothermund - 2018 - Cognition and Emotion 32 (1):222-230.
Hobbes on the function of evaluative speech.Thomas Holden - 2016 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (1):123-144.
The Sense and Reference of Evaluative Terms.Christine Tappolet - 1995 - In Petr Kotatko & John Biro (eds.), Frege: Sense and Reference one Hundred Years later. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 113--127.
Licensing and sensitivity in polarity items: From downward entailment to (non)veridicality.Anastasia Giannakidou - manuscript
When all is revealed: A dissociation between evaluative learning and contingency awareness.Eamon P. Fulcher & Marianne Hammerl - 2001 - Consciousness and Cognition 10 (4):524-549.
Positive polarity - negative polarity.Anna Szabolcsi - 2004 - Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22 (2):409-452..
Evaluative Learning with “Subliminally” Presented Stimuli.Jan de Houwer, Hilde Hendrickx & Frank Baeyens - 1997 - Consciousness and Cognition 6 (1):87-107.
Tracking hand movements captures the response dynamics of the evaluative priming effect.Naoaki Kawakami & Emi Miura - 2019 - Cognition and Emotion 33 (3):452-465.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
“Go to hell fucking faggots, may you die!” framing the LGBT subject in online comments.Fabienne Baider - 2018 - Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 14 (1):69-92.
Narrating hostility, challenging hostile narratives.Fabienne Baider & Monika Kopytowska - 2018 - Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 14 (1):1-24.
Cognitive Style and Frame Susceptibility in Decision-Making.David R. Mandel & Irina V. Kapler - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
References found in this work
A Natural History of Negation.Jon Barwise & Laurence R. Horn - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (3):1103.