Informal Logic 35 (4):508-538 (2015)

Abstract
This paper presents a formalization of informal logic using the Carneades Argumentation System, a formal, computational model of argument that consists of a formal model of argument graphs and audiences. Conflicts between pro and con arguments are resolved using proof standards, such as preponderance of the evidence. CAS also formalizes argumentation schemes. Schemes can be used to check whether a given argument instantiates the types of argument deemed normatively appropriate for the type of dialogue.
Keywords RSA triangle  conductive argument  formal argumentation systems  informal logic  premise acceptability  real arguments  relevance  sufficiency
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.22329/il.v35i4.4335
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,066
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Story Similarity in Arguments From Analogy.Douglas Walton - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (2):190-221.
Johnson and the Soundness Doctrine.David Botting - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (4):501-525.
How Philosophical is Informal Logic?John Woods - 2000 - Informal Logic 20 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-12-11

Total views
31 ( #317,379 of 2,344,480 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #514,032 of 2,344,480 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes