Oxford University Press UK (2002)
AbstractThe great biologist Louis Pasteur suppressed 'awkward' data because it didn't support the case he was making. John Snow, the 'first epidemiologist' was doing nothing others had not done before. Gregor Mendel, the supposed 'founder of genetics' never grasped the fundamental principles of 'Mendelian' genetics. Joseph Lister's famously clean hospital wards were actually notorious dirty. And Einstein's general relativity was only 'confirmed' in 1919 because an eminent British scientist cooked his figures. These are just some of the revelations explored in this book. Drawing on current history of science scholarship, Fabulous Science shows that many of our greatest heroes of science were less than honest about their experimental data and not above using friends in high places to help get their ideas accepted. It also reveals that the alleged revolutionaries of the history of science were often nothing of the sort. Prodigiously able they may have been, but the epithet of the 'man before his time' usually obscures vital contributions made their unsung contemporaries and the intrinsic merits of ideas they overturned. These distortions of the historical record mostly arise from our tendency to read the present back into the past. But in many cases, scientists owe their immortality to a combination of astonishing effrontery and their skills as self-promoters.
9780198609391 0198609396 0192804049
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
9780198609391 0198609396 0192804049
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Why Knowledge is the Property of a Community and Possibly None of its Members.Boaz Miller - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (260):417-441.
Virtues and Vices in Scientific Practice.Cedric Paternotte & Milena Ivanova - 2017 - Synthese 194 (5).
„Zur Selbstreproduktion Befähigte Substanzen“ Als Zelluläre Angriffsorte Chemischer Cancerogene.Volker Wunderlich - 2007 - NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 15 (4):271-283.
Similar books and articles
Fabulous Science: Fact and Fiction in the History of Scientific Discovery. [REVIEW]Alex Dolby - 2004 - British Journal for the History of Science 37 (2):236-237.
Physics and Metaphysics: Theories of Space and Time.Jennifer Trusted - 1991 - Routledge.
The Role of History in Science.Richard Creath - 2010 - Journal of the History of Biology 43 (2):207 - 214.
Credit for Discoveries: Citation Data as a Basis for History of Science Analysis.B. I. B. Lindahl, Aant Elzinga & Alfred Welljams-Dorof - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (6):609-620.
Einstein's Discovery of Special Relativity.Gary Gutting - 1972 - Philosophy of Science 39 (1):51-68.
Science Studies and Mendel's Paradigm.Vítězslav Orel - 2010 - Perspectives on Science 18 (2):pp. 226-241.
Ozone Layer: A Philosophy of Science Perspective.Maureen Christie - 2001 - Cambridge University Press.
Wissenschaftsgeschichte — Eine Brücke Zwischen Natur- Und Geisteswissenschaften†.Reijer Hooykaas - 1982 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 5 (3-4):153-172.
Explaining Scientific Discovery.Aleksandar Jokic - 1991 - Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara
Descartes as Critic of Galileo's Scientific Methodology.Roger Ariew - 1986 - Synthese 67 (1):77 - 90.
Twenty-First-Century Genetics and Genomics: Contributions of HPS-Informed Research and Pedagogy.Niklas M. Gericke - 2014 - In Michael R. Matthews (ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer. pp. 423-467.
Philosophy and Revolutions in Genetics: Deep Science and Deep Technology.Keekok Lee - 2003 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Does Science Education Need the History of Science?Graeme Gooday, John Lynch, Kenneth Wilson & Constance Barsky - 2008 - Isis 99:322-330.
Science in the Everyday World: Why Perspectives From the History of Science Matter.Katherine Pandora & Karen Rader - 2008 - Isis 99:350-364.