Informal Logic, a Handbook for Critical Argumentation

Philosophy and Rhetoric 26 (1):48-52 (1993)

Authors
Douglas Walton
University of Windsor
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,480
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Inquiry: A New Paradigm for Critical Thinking.Mark Battersby (ed.) - 2018 - Windsor, Canada: Windsor Studies in Argumentation.
Nonconsequentialist decisions.Jonathan Baron - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):1-10.
Rhetoric and Argumentation: How Clinical Practice Guidelines Think.Jonathan Fuller - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (3):433-441.

View all 65 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Walton, Douglas N., "Informal Logic. A Handbook for Critical Argumentation".Edgar González Ruiz - 1990 - Analogía Filosófica: Revista de Filosofía, Investigación y Difusión 4 (2):195.
Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation. [REVIEW]Gerard Casey - 1988 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 32:379-380.
How Philosophical is Informal Logic?John Woods - 2000 - Informal Logic 20 (2).
Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach.Douglas Walton - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
Emotion, Argumentation and Informal Logic.Michael A. Gilbert - 2004 - Informal Logic 24 (3):245-264.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-21

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes