Languages of art: An emendation

Philosophical Studies 22 (5-6):82 - 85 (1971)
In nelson goodman's "languages of art" a symbol system must be 'finitely differentiated', both syntactically and semantically, to count as a 'notation'. goodman's formulations of these differentiation requirements are seriously defective. it is shown that most of the examples of systems which he claims fail these requirements, do not fail them as they are stated. reformulations of the two requirements are offered, which accord with the examples and seem otherwise acceptable
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00420447
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,756
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Depictive Structure?Ben Blumson - 2011 - Philosophical Papers 40 (1):1-25.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

77 ( #68,923 of 2,177,988 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #166,811 of 2,177,988 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums