David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (1):69 - 108 (2012)
The Quietist affair at the end of the seventeenth century has much to teach us about theories of the will in the period. Although Bossuet and Fénelon are the names most famously associated with the debate over the Quietist conception of pure love, Malebranche and his erstwhile disciple Lamy were the ones who debated the deep philosophical issues involved. This paper sets the historical context of the debate, discusses the positions as well as the arguments for and against them, and opens up investigation of important material that is all but ignored in the English literature and only incompletely addressed in the French
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
René Descartes (1984). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Cambridge University Press.
John Locke (2007). Essay Concerning Human Understanding. In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell.
Nicolas Malebranche (2007). The Search After Truth. In Aloysius Martinich, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Early Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell.
George Edward Moore (1922). Philosophical Studies. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sr Mary Bernard Curran (2009). Malebranche on Disinterestedness. Philosophy and Theology 21 (1/2):27-41.
Steven M. Nadler (ed.) (2000). The Cambridge Companion to Malebranche. Cambridge University Press.
Fred Ablondi (1996). Causality and Human Freedom in Malebranche. Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):321-331.
Andrew Pyle (2003). Malebranche. Routledge.
Nicholas Jolley (1990). The Light of the Soul: Theories of Ideas in Leibniz, Malebranche, and Descartes. Oxford University Press.
Steven M. Nadler (1992). Malebranche and Ideas. Oxford University Press.
Nicolas Malebranche (1997). The Search After Truth: Translated and Edited by Thomas M. Lennon and Paul J. Olscamp ; Elucidations of the Search After Truth: Translated and Edited by Thomas M. Lennon. [REVIEW] Cambridge University Press.
Jordan Taylor (2013). Emotional Sensations and the Moral Imagination in Malebranche. In H. Martyn Lloyd (ed.), The Discourse of Sensibility: The Knowing Body in the Enlightenment. Springer.
Tad M. Schmaltz (2010). Malebranche and Leibniz on the Best of All Possible Worlds. Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):28-48.
Andrew Pessin (2000). Malebranche's Natural Theodicy and the Incompleteness of God's Volitions. Religious Studies 36 (1):47-63.
Nathaniel Bowditch (2010). Malebranche. International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (3):363-382.
David Scott (2008). Malebranche and Descartes on Method: Psychologism, Free Will, and Doubt. Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (4):581-604.
Andrew Pessin (2000). Malebranche's Doctrine of Freedom / Consent and the Incompleteness of God's Volitions. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (1):21 – 53.
Added to index2012-02-20
Total downloads33 ( #145,596 of 1,924,718 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #254,650 of 1,924,718 )
How can I increase my downloads?