Measuring the Unmeasurable by Ticking Boxes and Opening Pandora's Box? Mixed Methods Research as a Useful Tool for Investigating Exceptional and Spiritual Experiences


Abstract
A monomethod bias still prevails in the psychology of religion, with the developing field studying the relationship between religiosity, spirituality and health being almost completely dominated by questionnaire research. This comes as a surprise, because the experiential side of religion, spirituality, can by definition be regarded as inner and private experiences of transcendence that have frequently been described as being of utmost importance. At first glance, from this perspective, standardized questionnaire scales appear to be inappropriate for “measuring the unmeasurable”. Until now, no questionnaire instrument developed for the purpose of assessing spiritual and religious experiences has been qualitatively double-checked for intermethod validity. In order to throw light on whether questionnaire instruments are appropriate for measuring domains of spiritual and transcendental experiences, we tested a newly developed questionnaire instrument, the Exceptional Experience Questionnaire , for intermethod validity by conducting post-questionnaire interviews . This revealed that the EEQ was able to grasp these experiences within reasonable limits. However, two thirds of our interview sample said that the study had changed how they viewed these experiences. These findings suggest that the reactivity of quantitative instruments in grasping spiritual and transcendental domains should be taken into account, especially when devising longitudinal designs and further research is clearly needed. As a consequence, introducing a reflective circle of results stemming from both quantitative and qualitative approaches is recommended as the most useful and appropriate research tool for studying spiritual or mystical experiences, if not all constructs
Keywords TRANSPERSONAL PSYCHOLOGY   LONGITUDINAL DESIGNS   MIXED METHODS RESEARCH   SPIRITUALITY   INTERMETHOD VALIDITY   SPIRITUAL EXPERIENCES
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/157361208x317123
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,395
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Confronting the Dilemma of Mixed Methods.Bradford J. Wiggins - 2011 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 31 (1):44.
Nonordinary and Transcendent Experiences: Transpersonal Aspects of Consciousness.William Braud - 2003 - Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research 97 (1):1-26.
A Rationale for Mixed Methods (Integrative) Research Programmes in Education.Mansoor Niaz - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (2):287-305.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-20

Total views
13 ( #662,512 of 2,291,344 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #231,371 of 2,291,344 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature