Authors
R. Jay Wallace
University of California, Berkeley
Abstract
My commentators have given me much to think about, and I am grateful to them for their serious engagement with my work. Their many objections coalesce primarily around the following issues, which I shall address in turn: the normative approach; praiseworthiness; practical reason and moral reasons; physical possibility; the exercise of general powers; nomic necessity and revisionism about blame; ultimate responsibility and control.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy of Mind
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017
ISBN(s) 0031-8205
DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00177.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,508
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Manipulation, Compatibilism, and Moral Responsibility.Alfred R. Mele - 2008 - The Journal of Ethics 12 (3-4):263-286.
A Theory of the Normative Force of Pleas.Christopher Evan Franklin - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (2):479-502.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
58 ( #160,036 of 2,330,880 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #587,623 of 2,330,880 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes