Responsibility and Priority in Liver Transplantation

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (1):23-35 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a provocative 1991 paper, Alvin Moss and Mark Siegler argued that it may be fair to give individuals with alcohol-related end-stage liver disease lower priority for a liver transplant than those who develop end-stage liver disease from other factors. Like other organs, there is a substantial gap between the available livers for transplantation and the number of people who need liver transplants. Yet, unlike those with end-stage renal disease, who can survive for some time on dialysis before receiving a kidney transplant, those with liver failure will die without a liver transplant

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Responsibility, alcoholism, and liver transplantation.Walter Glannon - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (1):31 – 49.
Partial Liver Transplantation from Living Donors.Macro Segre - 1992 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1 (4):305.
Scientists and their responsibility.William R. Shea & Beat Sitter-Liver (eds.) - 1989 - Canton, MA: Watson Pub. International.
Ethics and the Acquisition of Organs.T. M. Wilkinson - 2011 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
The Case against Conscription of Cadaveric Organs for Transplantation.Walter Glannon - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (3):330-336.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
131 (#136,623)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?