Noûs 34 (s14):301-323 (2000)
Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD), now also known as Dissociative Iden- tity Disorder, raises many questions about the nature of persons, the goals of treatment, the suggestibility of patients, and the reliability of defendant reports of their own mental states. These issues become crucial when courts need to decide whether or not to punish a person with MPD who has committed a crime. This paper will explore that issue and propose a test of when people with MPD should be held criminally responsible.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Counting Persons and Living with Alters: Comments on Matthews.Stephen E. Braude - 2003 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 10 (2):153-156.
Proposition: A Personality Disorder May Nullify Responsibility for a Criminal Act.Robert Kinscherff - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 38 (4):745-759.
A Discursive Account of Multiple Personality Disorder.Grant R. Gillett - 1997 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 4 (3):213-22.
Personality Disorders and Responsibility: Learning From Peay.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (3):245-248.
Delusion, Dissociation and Identity.Jeanette Kennett & Steve Matthews - 2003 - Philosophical Explorations 6 (1):31-49.
Fuzzy Fault Lines: Selves in Multiple Personality Disorder.George Graham - 1999 - Philosophical Explorations 2 (3):159-174.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads37 ( #137,450 of 2,158,310 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #194,705 of 2,158,310 )
How can I increase my downloads?