Sophia 48 (4):351 - 378 (2009)
If God is morally perfect then He must perform the morally best actions, but creating humans is not the morally best action. If this line of reasoning can be maintained then the mere fact that humans exist contradicts the claim that God exists. This is the ‘anthropic argument’. The anthropic argument, is related to, but distinct from, the traditional argument from evil. The anthropic argument forces us to consider the ‘creation question’: why did God not create other gods rather than humans? That is, if God is omniscient, omnipotent, and morally perfect then why didn’t He create a world populated exclusively by beings that are perfect in the same way that He is—ontological equivalents— rather than choosing to create humans with finite natures and all the suffering that this entails?
|Keywords||Problem of evil God Free will Plantinga|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Megill's Multiverse Meta-Argument.Klaas J. Kraay - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (3):235-241.
Similar books and articles
Alvin Plantinga on the Ontological Argument.William L. Rowe - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (2):87 - 92.
Bolstering the Argument From Non-Belief.Victor Cosculluela - 1996 - Religious Studies 32 (4):507-512.
Added to index2009-11-11
Total downloads70 ( #73,935 of 2,158,296 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #133,489 of 2,158,296 )
How can I increase my downloads?