Argumentation 1 (3):317-331 (1987)

Authors
Douglas Walton
University of Windsor
Abstract
This article outlines criteria for the evaluation of the argumentum ad hominem (argument against the person, or personal attack in argument) that is traditionally a part of the curriculum in informal logic. The argument is shown to be a kind of criticism which works by shifting the burden of proof in dialogue through citing a pragmatic inconsistency in an arguer's position. Several specific cases of ad hominem argumentation which pose interesting problems in analyzing this type of criticism are studied
Keywords argumentation  personal attack  fallacies  criticisms  informal logic  dialogue  bias  rhetoric  inconsistency  refutation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00136781
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,391
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Fallacies.C. L. Hamblin - 1970 - Vale Press.
From Axiom to Dialogue.E. M. Barth & E. C. W. Krabbe - 1985 - Studia Logica 44 (2):228-230.
Elements of Logic.Richard Whately - 1827 - Scholars' Facsimiles & Reprints.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Moral Deliberation and Ad Hominem Fallacies.Uri D. Leibowitz - 2016 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 13 (5):507-529.
Attacking Authority.Matthews Steve - 2011 - Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics 13 (2):59-70.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

When is a Fallacy Not a Fallacy?Joel Marks - 1988 - Metaphilosophy 19 (3‐4):307-312.
Ad Hominem Fallacies, Bias, and Testimony.Audrey Yap - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):97-109.
The Metaphoric Fallacy to a Deductive Inference.Brian Lightbody & Berman Michael - 2010 - Informal Logic: Reasoning and Argumentation in Theory and Practice 30 (2):185-193.
Slippery Slope Arguments.Douglas Walton - 1992 - Oxford University Press.
Do Critics of Heidegger Commit the Ad Hominem Fallacy?Daniel A. Dombrowski - 1996 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 10 (2):71-75.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-01-04

Total views
77 ( #119,046 of 2,326,161 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #86,785 of 2,326,161 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes