Teleological Justification of Argumentation Schemes

Argumentation 27 (2):111-142 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Argumentation schemes are forms of reasoning that are fallible but correctable within a self-correcting framework. Their use provides a basis for taking rational action or for reasonably accepting a conclusion as a tentative hypothesis, but they are not deductively valid. We argue that teleological reasoning can provide the basis for justifying the use of argument schemes both in monological and dialogical reasoning. We consider how such a teleological justification, besides being inspired by the aim of directing a bounded cognizer to true belief and correct choices, needs to take into account the attitudes of dialogue partners as well as normative models of dialogue and communicative activity types, in particular social and cultural settings

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,685

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Argumentation schemes.Douglas Walton, Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno.
Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning.Douglas N. Walton - 1996 - Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Looking for Arguments.Hugo Mercier - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (3):305-324.
Introduction.Ana Laura Nettel & Georges Roque - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):1-17.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-06

Downloads
93 (#167,088)

6 months
14 (#113,032)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Douglas Walton
Last affiliation: University of Windsor

References found in this work

Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
Intention, plans, and practical reason.Michael Bratman - 1987 - Cambridge: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Inquiry.Robert C. Stalnaker - 1984 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 164 references / Add more references