Abstract
Anger is central to moral and legal decision-making. Angry individuals reason differently than people in a temperate state. Aristotle and the ancient Greeks understood anger’s practical role in forensic argument and moral judgment—an intuition modern psychologists have largely confirmed. Psychological experiments show that people primed to anger will draw different inferences than people in a tranquil state of mind from the same factual circumstances. As Aristotle understood, our ability to reach conclusions about a set of facts is influenced by emotional processes such as anger. This article analyzes competing views of anger in contemporary moral philosophy. It uses cross-cutting psychological, biological, sociological, anthropological, historical and philosophical arguments about the experience and expression of anger to critically assess leading philosophical accounts of the role of anger in moral and judicial decision making.
Keywords Legal Reasoning  Legal Theories  Crime and Punishment
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Anger and Morality.Benoît Dubreuil - 2015 - Topoi 34 (2):475-482.
Characteristics of Anger: Notes for a Systems Theory of Emotion.Michael Potegal - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):215-216.
A Study of Virtuous and Vicious Anger.Zac Cogley - 2014 - In Kevin Timpe & Craig Boyd (eds.), Virtues and Their Vices. Oxford University Press. pp. 199.
Guit, Anger, and Retribution.Raffaele Rodogno - 2010 - Legal Theory 16 (1):59-76.
Moral Bystanders and the Virtue of Forgiveness.Linda Radzik - 2010 - In Christopher R. Allers & Marieke Smit (eds.), Forgiveness in Perspective. Rodopi. pp. 66--69.
Moderation or the Middle Way: Two Approaches to Anger.Peter Vernezze - 2008 - Philosophy East and West 58 (1):2-16.
Making Political Anger Possible: A Task for Civic Education.Patricia White - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (1):1-13.
Great Anger.Anthony Cunningham - 2005 - The Dalhousie Review 85 (3).
Anger and Economic Rationality.Daniel John Zizzo - 2008 - Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (2):147-167.
Taking the Heat Out of Provocation.S. Gough - 1999 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 19 (3):481-494.
Anti-Corporate Anger as a Form of Care-Based Moral Agency.Sheldene Simola - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 94 (S2):255 - 269.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-06-15

Total views
498 ( #16,302 of 2,461,991 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #30,747 of 2,461,991 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes