Phronesis 51 (3):230-251 (2006)
Aristotle begins "On Interpretation" with an analysis of the existence of linguistic entities as both physical and meaningful. Two things have been lacking for a full appreciation of this analysis: a more literal translation of the passage and an ample understanding of the distinction between symbols and signs. In this article, therefore, I first offer a translation of this opening passage (16a1-9) that allows the import of Aristotle's thinking to strike the reader. Then I articulate the distinction between symbol and sign so crucial to understanding this passage. Aristotle employs this distinction, I argue, in order to show how the linguistic entities he defines later in "On Interpretation" (that is, name, verb, denial, affirmation, declaration, and articulation) are both conventional and natural, owing to their being both symbols and signs, respectively. Finally, I suggest why Aristotle's analysis of how linguistic entities exist as both physical and meaningful is fitting, since man himself, "the animal that has speech," lives at the boundary between nature and intelligence
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Opening of "On Interpretation": Toward a More Literal Reading.Matthew D. Walz - 2006 - Phronesis 51 (3):230 - 251.
Taking Desirelessness () Seriously.Christopher G. Framarin - 2005 - Asian Philosophy 15 (2):143 – 155.
Literal Meaning, Conventional Meaning and First Meaning.C. J. L. Talmage - 1994 - Erkenntnis 40 (2):213 - 225.
“It Says What It Says”.Lars Hertzberg - 2011 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4):589-603.
Reduction and Realism.Margaret Morrison - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:286 - 293.
A Note on Kripke's Footnote 56 Argument for the Essentiality of Origin.Ross Cameron - 2005 - Ratio 18 (3):262-275.
The Patient as Text: A Model of Clinical Hermeneutics.Stephen L. Daniel - 1986 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (2).
Turing's Rules for the Imitation Game.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):573-582.
Phenomenology and de Re Interpretation: A Critique of Brandom's Reading of Hegel.Stephen Houlgate - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (1):29 – 47.
Malapropisms and Davidson's Theories of Literal Meaning.John Michael McGuire - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 6:93-97.
The Automatic and the Incomplete. Remarks on Recanati's Literal Meaning (Lo Automático y Lo Incompleto. Comentarios a Literal Meaning de Recanati).Stefano Predelli - 2006 - Critica 38 (112):21 - 33.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads7 ( #523,357 of 2,168,616 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,837 of 2,168,616 )
How can I increase my downloads?