Mind 107 (427):625-652 (1998)
Wide content and individualist approaches to the individuation of thoughts appear to be incompatible; I think they are not. I propose a criterion for the classification of thoughts which captures both. Thoughts, I claim, should be individuated by their teleological functions. Where teleological function is construed in the standard way - according to the aetiological theory - individuating thoughts by their function cannot produce a classification which is both individualistic and consistent with the principle that sameness of wide content is sufficient for sameness of psychological state. There is, however, an alternative approach to function, the relational theory, which is preferable on independent grounds. A taxonomy of thoughts based on these functions reconciles wide content with individualism. One consequence of individuating thoughts in this way is that intentional content is context sensitive. I discuss some of the implications of context sensitive content
|Keywords||Content Epistemology Individualism Psychology Thought|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Review of Jessica Brown, Anti-Individualism and Knowledge. [REVIEW]Asa Wikforss - 2005 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13:525-541.
Individualism and the New Logical Connections Argument.Anthony B. Dardis - 2002 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (4):83-102.
Content, Kinds, and Individualism in Marr's Theory of Vision.Lawrence A. Shapiro - 1993 - Philosophical Review 102 (4):489-513.
From Natural Function to Indeterminate Content.S. R. Sullivan - 1993 - Philosophical Studies 69 (2-3):129-37.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #162,280 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,698 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?