Cambridge University Press (2008)
Recent work in artificial intelligence has increasingly turned to argumentation as a rich, interdisciplinary area of research that can provide new methods related to evidence and reasoning in the area of law. Douglas Walton provides an introduction to basic concepts, tools and methods in argumentation theory and artificial intelligence as applied to the analysis and evaluation of witness testimony. He shows how witness testimony is by its nature inherently fallible and sometimes subject to disastrous failures. At the same time such testimony can provide evidence that is not only necessary but inherently reasonable for logically guiding legal experts to accept or reject a claim. Walton shows how to overcome the traditional disdain for witness testimony as a type of evidence shown by logical positivists, and the views of trial sceptics who doubt that trial rules deal with witness testimony in a way that yields a rational decision-making process
|Keywords||Law Methodology Witnesses Evidence (Law Reasoning Artificial intelligence Relevance (Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$23.87 new (78% off) $29.95 used (66% off) $66.39 direct from Amazon (25% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||K213.W355 2008|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
A General Structure for Legal Arguments About Evidence Using Bayesian Networks.Norman Fenton, Martin Neil & David A. Lagnado - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (1):61-102.
Some Artificial Intelligence Tools for Argument Evaluation: An Introduction.Douglas Walton - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (3):317-340.
A Normative Framework for Argument Quality: Argumentation Schemes with a Bayesian Foundation.Ulrike Hahn & Jos Hornikx - 2016 - Synthese 193 (6):1833-1873.
Expertise, Argumentation, and the End of Inquiry.Axel Gelfert - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (3):297-312.
Applying Recent Argumentation Methods to Some Ancient Examples of Plausible Reasoning.Douglas Walton, Christopher W. Tindale & Thomas F. Gordon - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (1):85-119.
Similar books and articles
Hendrik Kaptein, Henry Prakken and Bart Verheij (Eds): Review of Legal Evidence and Proof: Statistics, Stories, Logic. [REVIEW]Douglas Walton - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (4):371-377.
Review of Douglas Walton, Witness Testimony Evidence: Argumentation, Artificial Intelligence, and Law. [REVIEW]Michael S. Pardo - 2008 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (11).
Legal Evidence and Proof: Statistics, Stories, Logic.Hendrik Kaptein - 2008 - Ashgate.
Automation of Legal Reasoning: A Study on Artificial Intelligence and Law.Peter Wahlgren - 1992 - Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers.
A Hybrid Formal Theory of Arguments, Stories and Criminal Evidence.Floris J. Bex, Peter J. van Koppen, Henry Prakken & Bart Verheij - 2010 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (2):123-152.
The Importance of Commercial Case Studies in Artificial Intelligence and Law.Richard Susskind - 1993 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (1):65-67.
On the Artificiality of Artificial Intelligence.Hans F. M. Crombag - 1993 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (1):39-49.
Is There a Burden of Questioning?Douglas Walton - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (1):1-43.
Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning About Evidence: Argumentation Schemes and Generalisations. [REVIEW]Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Chris Reed & Douglas Walton - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):125-165.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #182,884 of 2,169,146 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,568 of 2,169,146 )
How can I increase my downloads?