语言预设概念空泛无物吗？（A Defense of the Notion of Semantic Presupposition)
In Bo Mou & 博 牟 (eds.), 留美哲学博士文选：当代基础理论研究 (Contemporary Inquiries into the Foundational Issues of Philosophy). 商务印书馆 (the Commercial Press, China). pp. 190-224 (2002)
| Authors |
Xinli Wang
Juniata College
|
| Abstract |
斯特劳逊 （Strawson）的语义预设概念在语义学和语言哲学研究上颇有建树。尽管如此，语义预设概念一直遭受来自各方面的批判。概要说来，对语义预设概念之批判主要来自两个方面：其一，试图抽去语义预设概念的逻辑基础，即非真值概念 (the notion of truthvaluelessness)，从而达到间接地拒斥语义预设概念之目的。其二，直接批判语义预设概念本身。他们或者论证此概念在理论上不自恰或微不足道，或者断定即使此概念本身在理论上自恰，但实为一空洞无物之概念。因为我们根本找任何一个语义预设的具体例证。所以，语义预设概念不具任何真正的哲学意义。它只是一个当代神话，理应拒斥。 -/- 玻尔(S. Ber)和莱肯(W. Lycan)对语义预设概念的批判集中代表了以上两个方面。据我所知，迄今不曾有人对他们的批判予以全面和公正的反驳，以致于许多人人云亦云，使得他们的论点至今颇有影响。给予玻尔和莱恩的批判以全面反驳乃本文初衷。于此相关，我以为很有必要澄清对语义预设概念的诸多误解，从而确立一个理论上自恰，实际上可行，和确有实质性内容的语义预设概念。基于以上考虑，我对语义预设概念批判之反驳包括正 反两个方面。在第二节，我试图建立一个自恰，完备，非庸俗的语义预设概念。基于这一概念，第三节对玻尔和莱恩反对语义预设的两个核心批判予以全面反驳。第四节着重辩护非真值概念。本文的最后结论是：各种批判并未损伤斯特劳逊的语义预设概念的精髓。语 义预设概念非但不是一个当代神话，而且具有重大哲学意义。
.
|
| Keywords | presupposition semantic presupposition truth-value gap trivalent logic bivalent logic P. Strawson B. Russell |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Options |
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
|
Download options
External links
(no proxy) Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
语义预设概念空泛无物吗？(Is the Notion of Semantic Presupposition Empty?).Xinli Wang（王新力) - 2002 - In Contemporary Inquiries Into the Foundational Issues of Philosophy. the Commercial Press, China.
IV. Strawson on the Traditional Logic.Alan Hausman - 1969 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 12 (1-4):254-259.
Multivalent Semantics for Vagueness and Presupposition.Benjamin Spector - 2016 - Topoi 35 (1):45-55.
Semantic Concept of Existential Presupposition.Jiří Raclavský - 2011 - Human Affairs 21 (3):249-261.
Introduction: Presuppositions Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology.Filippo Domaneschi - 2016 - Topoi 35 (1):5-8.
Some Remarks on Certain Trivalent Accounts of Presupposition Projection.Benjamin R. George - 2014 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 24 (1-2):86-117.
On the Formalization of Strawson's Presupposition.Jacek Malinowski - 2006 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):111-118.
An Interpretation of Łukasiewicz’s 4-Valued Modal Logic.José M. Méndez, Gemma Robles & Francisco Salto - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (1):73-87.
Wittgenstein and Semantic Presuppositions Generated by Definite Descriptions in Subject-Position.Paulo Roberto Margutti Pinto - unknown
The Limits to Debate: A Revised Theory of Semantic Presupposition.Noel Burton-Roberts - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.
Non-Catastrophic Presupposition Failure.Stephen Yablo - 2006 - In Judith Jarvis Thomson & Alex Byrne (eds.), Content and Modality: Themes From the Philosophy of Robert Stalnaker. Oxford University Press.
Anti-Dynamics: Presupposition Projection Without Dynamic Semantics. [REVIEW]Philippe Schlenker - 2007 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (3):325--356.
The Logic and Mathematics of Occasion Sentences.Pieter A. M. Seuren, Venanzio Capretta & Herman Geuvers - 2001 - Linguistics and Philosophy 24 (5):531 - 595.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-12-23
Total views
107 ( #75,743 of 2,270,985 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #37,385 of 2,270,985 )
2015-12-23
Total views
107 ( #75,743 of 2,270,985 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #37,385 of 2,270,985 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
