Beyond Analytic Philosophy: Doing Justice to What We Know

Bradford (1988)
Abstract
This cogent and knowledgeable critique of the tradition of modern analytic philosophy focuses on the work of its central figures -- Russell, Carnap, and Quine -- and finds it wanting. In its place, Hao Wang unfolds his own original view of what philosophy could and should be. The base of any serious philosophy, he contends, should take as its point of departure the actual state of human knowledge. He explains the relation of this new tradition to mathematical logic and reveals the crucial transitions and mistakes in mainstream Anglo-American philosophy that make a new approach so compelling.Equally at home in philosophy and mathematics, Wang is uniquely qualified to take on the task of critically examining modern philosophy. He carefully traces the path of ideas from Russell and Wittgenstein through the Vienna Circle to modern British and American philosophy, and makes use of his familiarity with the profound thought of Kurt Gödel with whom he has had numerous discussions. He also presents the broader significance of Russell's philosophy, provides a comprehensive and unified treatment of Quine's work in logic and in philosophy, and delineates what is common between Carnap and Quine
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 9780262730808  
DOI 10.2307/2185272
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 37,153
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Tarski on “Essentially Richer” Metalanguages.David DeVidi & Graham Solomon - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (1):1-28.
Worlds, Models and Descriptions.John F. Sowa - 2006 - Studia Logica 84 (2):323-360.
The End of Philosophy?John Arthur Passmore - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (1):1 – 19.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Undefinability of Analytic Philosophy.Daniel Andler - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:267-285.
Hegel, Idealism, and Analytic Philosophy (Review). [REVIEW]Kevin Harrelson - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (4):668-670.
What is Analytic Philosophy?Adrian Walsh - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):734-737.
Must We Argue?Mark T. Nelson - 2004 - The Philosophers' Magazine (26):41-42.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-02-06

Total downloads
30 ( #220,478 of 2,308,755 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #65,299 of 2,308,755 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature