Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (2):178-210 (2011)

Abstract
In this article, I examine Luhmann’s, Bunge’s and others’ views on emergence, and argue that Luhmann’s epistemological construal of emergence in terms of Totalausschluss is both ontologically flawed and detrimental to an appropriate understanding of the distinctive features of social emergence. By contrast, Bunge’s rational emergentism, his CESM model, and Wimsatt’s characterization of emergence as nonaggregativity provide a useful framework to investigate emergence. While researchers in the field of social theory and sociology tend to regard Luhmann as the sole representative of systems theory, the latter has been characterized by its diversity, and the writings of such systems theorists as Mario Bunge deserve more attention from social researchers than they receive at present. Finally, this article suggests that the perennial debate over methodological individualism and holism in social science may make real progress if such ambiguous terms as reduction and reductionism are elucidated before they are employed
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0048393109350751
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,089
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 1991 - London and New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.

View all 68 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A “Black Box” of Stakeholder Thinking.Kalle Pajunen - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):27-32.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Novelty and the Bounds of Unknowledge in Economics.Ulrich Witt - 2009 - Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (4):361-375.
A New Problem for Ontological Emergence.D. Heard - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (222):55-62.
Emergence in Physics.Patrick McGivern & Alexander Rueger - 2010 - In Antonella Corradini & Timothy O'Connor (eds.), Emergence in Science and Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 213-232.
Complexity and Novelty: Reading Mark C. Taylor.Flavia Monceri - 2005 - World Futures 61 (5):397 – 408.
Nonlinearity and Metaphysical Emergence.Jessica M. Wilson - 2013 - In Stephen Mumford & Matthew Tugby (eds.), Metaphysics and Science.
Emergence in Effective Field Theories.Jonathan Bain - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3 (3):257-273.
Is Weak Emergence Just in the Mind?Mark A. Bedau - 2008 - Minds and Machines 18 (4):443-459.
Computational and Conceptual Emergence.Paul Humphreys - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (5):584-594.
The Emergence of Creativity.R. Keith Sawyer - 1999 - Philosophical Psychology 12 (4):447 – 469.
Emergence, Epiphenomenalism and Consciousness.William E. Seager - 2006 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (1-2):21-38.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-29

Total views
59 ( #191,279 of 2,499,053 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #278,516 of 2,499,053 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes