Complexity 2020:1-10 (2020)
Authors | |
Abstract |
The expert is a vital role in multicriteria decision-making, which provides source decision opinions. In the existing group decision-making activities, the selection of experts is usually conducted artificially, which relies on personal subjective experience. It has been the urgent demand for an automatic selection of experts, which can help to determine their weights for the follow-up decision calculation. In this paper, an expert classification method is proposed to solve the problem. First, the CatBoost classification algorithm is improved by integrating the 2-tuple linguistic, which can effectively extract the features of samples. Second, the framework of the expert classification is designed. The flow combines the expert resume collection, expert classification, and database update. Third, a decision-making case is analyzed for the expert selection issue. The experiment and result indicate that the proposed classifier performs better than the classic methods. The proposed classification method of the decision experts can support the automatic and intelligent operation of the decision-making activities.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1155/2020/8147617 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Deep-Learning Prediction Model with Serial Two-Level Decomposition Based on Bayesian Optimization.Xue-Bo Jin, Hong-Xing Wang, Xiao-Yi Wang, Yu-Ting Bai, Ting-Li Su & Jian-Lei Kong - 2020 - Complexity 2020:1-14.
Similar books and articles
Decision Making, Computer Attitudes and Expert Systems: What is Our Direction? [REVIEW]Peter P. Mykytyn - 1989 - AI and Society 3 (2):133-141.
Graded Soft Expert Set as a Generalization of Hesitant Fuzzy Set.Afshan Qayyum & Tanzeela Shaheen - 2019 - Journal of Intelligent Systems 29 (1):223-236.
Extended Heronian Mean Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Information for Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making.Minghua Shi, Yuewen Xiao & Qing Wan - 2019 - Complexity 2019:1-19.
A Heterogeneous Multiattribute Group Decision-Making Method Based on Intuitionistic Triangular Fuzzy Information.Jun Xu, Jiu-Ying Dong, Shu-Ping Wan, De-Yan Yang & Yi-Feng Zeng - 2019 - Complexity 2019:1-18.
Approach to Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Aggregation Operators.Minghua Shi & Qingxian Xiao - 2019 - Journal of Intelligent Systems 29 (1):423-439.
Patterns of Decision Making in Kidney Allocation Problems.Marlies Ahlert - 2001 - Analyse & Kritik 23 (2):262-270.
Human Decision Making & the Symbolic Search Space Paradigm in AI.Derek Partridge - 1987 - AI and Society 1 (2):103-114.
Group Decision-Making Approach Based on Generalized Grey Linguistic 2-Tuple Aggregation Operators.Lidong Wang & Yanjun Wang - 2018 - Complexity 2018:1-14.
Expert Rule Versus Majority Rule Under Partial Information.Daniel Berend - 1993 - Theory and Decision 35 (2):179.
Dominance and Efficiency in Multicriteria Decision Under Uncertainty.F. Ben Abdelaziz, P. Lang & R. Nadeau - 1999 - Theory and Decision 47 (3):191-211.
Deliberative Decisions and Formal Multicriteria Analysis: Addressing Norton’s Skepticism.Sahotra Sarkar - 2018 - In Ben Minteer & Sahotra Sarkar (eds.), A Sustainable Philosophy—the Work of Bryan Norton. Springer Verlag.
Supporting Individuals in Group Decision-Making.P. Korhonen & J. Wallenius - 1990 - Theory and Decision 28 (3):313-329.
Some Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Einstein Weighted Averaging Aggregation Operators and Their Application to Group Decision Making.Khaista Rahman, Saleem Abdullah & Muhammad Sajjad Ali Khan - 2019 - Journal of Intelligent Systems 29 (1):393-408.
Artificial Decision-Making and Artificial Ethics: A Management Concern. [REVIEW]Omar E. M. Khalil - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (4):313 - 321.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-08-18
Total views
1 ( #1,458,869 of 2,409,640 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #540,301 of 2,409,640 )
2020-08-18
Total views
1 ( #1,458,869 of 2,409,640 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #540,301 of 2,409,640 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.