Three‐Valued Plurivaluationism: A Reply to Williamson's Criticisms on the Three‐Valued Approach to the Sorites Paradox

Philosophical Forum 47 (3-4):341-360 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How to avoid deviance (in logic).Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Amit Malhotra - 2002 - History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (3):215--36.
Two-Valued and Many-Valued Logic.A. A. Zinov'ev - 1963 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 2 (1):69-84.
Three-valued logics in modal logic.Barteld Kooi & Allard Tamminga - 2013 - Studia Logica 101 (5):1061-1072.
A cognitive neuroscience, dual-systems approach to the sorites paradox.Leib Litman & Mark Zelcer - 2013 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 25 (3):355-366.
Bochvar's algebras and corresponding propositional calculi.Viktor Finn & Revaz Grigolia - 1980 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 9 (1):39-43.
Heyting-valued interpretations for constructive set theory.Nicola Gambino - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 137 (1-3):164-188.
Fuzziness and the sorites paradox.Marcelo Vasconez - 2006 - Dissertation, Catholic University of Louvain
On Rine's view of Boolean algebras.George Epstein - 1981 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 10 (2):91-92.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-16

Downloads
22 (#712,914)

6 months
5 (#648,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references