South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):312-331 (2009)
AbstractWhat the authors attempt to address in this paper is a Kantian question: not whether, but how is cross -cultural understanding possible? And specifically, what is a more effective approach for cross -cultural understanding? The answer lies in an analysis of two different models of cross -cultural understanding, that is, propositional and hermeneutic understanding. To begin with, the author presents a linguistic interpretation of culture, i.e., a culture as a linguistically formulated and transmitted symbolic system with its conceptual core as a scheme of basic cultural presuppositions, which it referred to as a cultural language. After exploring the essential role of cultural presuppositions in cross -cultural understanding, the author discusses the traditional model of cross -cultural understanding, namely, the propositional model. Through critically examining the two popular versions of the propositional model, i.e., the projective approach and the adoptive approach to cross -cultural understanding, it is found that cross -cultural propositional understanding is doomed to failure. To move us beyond the absolutism -relativism trap embedded within propositional understanding, the author first introduces and discusses Hans-Georg Gadamer’s hermeneutic understanding, and then applies Hans-Georg Gadamer’s hermeneutic model of understanding to cross -cultural understanding. It is finally concluded that cross -cultural understanding is essentially hermeneutic—including the case of cultural learning, not propositional. Therefore, cross -cultural understanding is hermeneutically possible
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Language, Thought and Reality.Benjamin Lee Whorf, John B. Carroll & Stuart Chase - 1956 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 11 (4):695-695.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Toward an Understanding of Cross-Cultural Ethics: A Tentative Model. [REVIEW]William A. Wines & Nancy K. Napier - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (11):831 - 841.
Understanding Other Cultures: Studies in the Philosophical Problems of Cross-Cultural Interpretation.Carola Sandbacka - 1935 - Akateeminen Kirjakauppa.
Pluralistic Kantianism and Understanding the "Other".Murat Baç - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 11:13-18.
Ethical Challenges for Cross-Cultural Research Conducted by Psychologists From the United States.Frederick T. L. Leong & Brent Lyons - 2010 - Ethics and Behavior 20 (3-4):250-264.
Education, Autonomy, and Democratic Citizenship: Philosophy in a Changing World.David Bridges (ed.) - 1997 - Routledge.
The Socio-Cultural Embeddedness of Individuals' Ethical Reasoning in Organizations (Cross-Cultural Ethics).Linda Thorne & SusanBartholomew Saunders - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 35 (1):1 - 14.
Discipline, Moral Regulation, and Schooling: A Social History.Kate Rousmaniere, Kari Dehli & Ning De Coninck-Smith (eds.) - 1997 - Garland.
Self as Cultural Construct? An Argument for Levels of Self-Representations.Alexandra Zinck, Daniela Simon, Martin Schmidt-Daffy, Gottfried Vosgerau, Kirsten G. Volz, Anne Springer & Tobias Schlicht - 2009 - Philosophical Psychology 22 (6):687-709.
Cross-Cultural Understanding: Epistemology in Anthropology.P. S. - 1965 - Review of Metaphysics 19 (2):388-388.
Self–Other Relations and the Rationality of Cultures.Paul Healy - 2000 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (6):61-83.
Towards a Meta Ethics of Culture – Halfway to a Theory of Metanorms.M. Karmasin - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 39 (4):337 - 346.