The Propositional vs. Hermeneutic Models of Cross-Cultural Understanding

South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):312-331 (2009)

Abstract

What the authors attempt to address in this paper is a Kantian question: not whether, but how is cross -cultural understanding possible? And specifically, what is a more effective approach for cross -cultural understanding? The answer lies in an analysis of two different models of cross -cultural understanding, that is, propositional and hermeneutic understanding. To begin with, the author presents a linguistic interpretation of culture, i.e., a culture as a linguistically formulated and transmitted symbolic system with its conceptual core as a scheme of basic cultural presuppositions, which it referred to as a cultural language. After exploring the essential role of cultural presuppositions in cross -cultural understanding, the author discusses the traditional model of cross -cultural understanding, namely, the propositional model. Through critically examining the two popular versions of the propositional model, i.e., the projective approach and the adoptive approach to cross -cultural understanding, it is found that cross -cultural propositional understanding is doomed to failure. To move us beyond the absolutism -relativism trap embedded within propositional understanding, the author first introduces and discusses Hans-Georg Gadamer’s hermeneutic understanding, and then applies Hans-Georg Gadamer’s hermeneutic model of understanding to cross -cultural understanding. It is finally concluded that cross -cultural understanding is essentially hermeneutic—including the case of cultural learning, not propositional. Therefore, cross -cultural understanding is hermeneutically possible

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-07

Downloads
587 (#14,952)

6 months
27 (#33,060)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Truth and Method.H. G. Gadamer - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36 (4):487-490.
Language, Thought and Reality.Benjamin Lee Whorf, John B. Carroll & Stuart Chase - 1956 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 11 (4):695-695.
An Essay on Metaphysics.Robin George Collingwood - 1940 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
The Idea of a Social Science.Peter Winch - 1959 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 14 (2):247-248.
An Essay on Metaphysics.R. G. Collingwood - 1940 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Pluralistic Kantianism and Understanding the "Other".Murat Baç - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 11:13-18.
Life as Understanding.Günter Figal - 2004 - Research in Phenomenology 34 (1):20-30.
Cross-Cultural Understanding: Epistemology in Anthropology.P. S. - 1965 - Review of Metaphysics 19 (2):388-388.
Self–Other Relations and the Rationality of Cultures.Paul Healy - 2000 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (6):61-83.
Towards a Meta Ethics of Culture – Halfway to a Theory of Metanorms.M. Karmasin - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 39 (4):337 - 346.