Deficiency arguments against empiricism and the question of empirical indefeasibility

Philosophical Studies 173 (6):1675-1686 (2016)

Authors
Lisa Warenski
CUNY Graduate Center
Abstract
I give a brief overview of Albert Casullo’s Essays on A Priori Knowledge and Justification, followed by a summary of his diagnostic framework for evaluating accounts of a priori knowledge and a priori justification. I then discuss Casullo’s strategy for countering deficiency arguments against empiricism. A deficiency argument against empiricism can be countered by mounting a parallel argument against moderate rationalism that shows moderate rationalism to be defective in a similar way. I argue that a particular deficiency argument put forth by George Bealer in “The Incoherence of Empiricism” can withstand a parallel challenge mounted by Casullo.I then consider Casullo’s preferred analysis of the concept of a priori justification, which identifies a belief’s being justified by some nonexperiential source as the feature by virtue of which it is justified a priori. On the analysis, an apriori-justfied belief that is justified to a degree that is sufficient for knowledge is not taken to be empirically indefeasible. I argue that Casullo could avail himself of an empirical indefeasibility requirement that is consistent with his minimal and fallibilist conception of a priori knowledge. Doing so would capture a feature of the concept of a priori knowledge that is of particular interest and significance.
Keywords A priori knowledge  A priori justification  Albert Casullo  Intuition  Empirical indefeasibility  Fallibilism
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-015-0593-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Empiricism Coherent?Albert Casullo - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:61-74.
A Priori Justification.Albert Casullo - 2003 - Oxford University Press USA.
Naturalism, Fallibilism, and the a Priori.Lisa Warenski - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 142 (3):403-426.
Analyzing a Priori Knowledge.Albert Casullo - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 142 (1):77 - 90.
Empirical Indefeasibility and Nonfactuality.Mikael Janvid - 2010 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):183-197.
A Priori.Edwin Mares - 2011 - Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-05-13

Total views
103 ( #69,173 of 2,325,496 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #25,066 of 2,325,496 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature