English Law's Epistemology of Expert Testimony

Journal of Law and Society 33 (4):572-595 (2006)
Authors
Tony Ward
University of Hull
Abstract
This article draws upon the epistemology of testimony to analyse recent English case law on expert evidence. It argues that the courts are implicitly committed to an internalist epistemology and an inferentialist view of testimony, and draws a distinction between testimony which is treated as authoritative (where the fact-finder accepts the inferences drawn by the expert without attempting to assess their validity) and that which is treated as merely persuasive.
Keywords Legal philosophy  Epistemology of testimony  Expert testimont
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-03-15

Total downloads
747 ( #2,192 of 2,242,784 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
66 ( #5,069 of 2,242,784 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature