Journal of Philosophy 113 (4):177-209 (2016)
Rudolf Carnap famously distinguished between the external meanings that existence questions have when asked by philosophers and the internal meanings they have when asked by non-philosophers. Carnap’s overall position involved various controversial commitments, but relatively uncontroversial interpretative principles also lead to a Carnap-style distinction between internal and external questions. In section 1 of this paper I offer arguments for such a distinction in several particular cases; in section 2 I defend my arguments from numerous objections and motivate them by using points drawn from the general theory of interpretation; and in section 3 I discuss the meanings of external questions, ultimately arguing that they are best understood as involving primitive metaphysical notions, and that when so understood, it is natural to adopt a general error theory about philosophical ontology.
|Keywords||metaontology error theory Carnap internal/external distinction|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Does Ontology Rest on a Mistake?Stephen Yablo - 1998 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):229 - 283.
Linguistig Frameworks and Metaphysical Questions.James W. Comman - 1964 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):129 – 142.
Questions of Ontology.Kathrin Koslicki - 2015 - In Stephan Blatti & Sandra Lapointe (eds.), Ontology After Carnap. Oxford University Press.
Internal and External Questions About God.Le Poidevin Robin - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (4):485-500.
Why a Trade-Off? The Relationship Between the External and Internal Validity of Experiments.Luis M. Miller - 2010 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 25 (3):301-321.
Blurring Boundaries: Carnap, Quine, and the Internal–External Distinction.Sander Verhaegh - 2017 - Erkenntnis 82 (4):873-890.
Internal and External Questions About God: ROBIN LE POIDEVIN.Robin Le Poidevin - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (4):485-500.
Carnap and Quine on the Distinction Between External and Internal Questions.Bruce N. Waller - 1978 - Philosophical Studies 33 (3):301 - 312.
The Internal and External Components of Cognition.Ralph Wedgwood - 2006 - In Robert J. Stainton (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science. Malden MA: Blackwell. pp. 307-325.
Carnap and Ontological Pluralism.Matti Eklund - 2009 - In David John Chalmers, David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press. pp. 130--56.
Conceptual Tools for Assessing Experiments: Some Well-Entrenched Confusions Regarding the Internal/External Validity Distinction.María Jiménez-Buedo - 2011 - Journal of Economic Methodology 18 (3):271-282.
Metaphysics, Carnap's Remedy and Mach's Science.Alfred Schramm - 1998-1999 - Philosophia Scientiae 3 (2):109 - 120.
The Internal/External Question.Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward - 1994 - Grazier Philosophishe Studien 47:31-41.
Epistemologia e teoria sociale. Questioni interne ed esterne [Epistemology and social theory. Internal and external matters].Timothy Tambassi - 2011 - la Società Degli Individui 42.
Added to index2016-12-02
Total downloads103 ( #49,571 of 2,178,181 )
Recent downloads (6 months)44 ( #5,316 of 2,178,181 )
How can I increase my downloads?