Kant and the apriority of space

Philosophical Review 107 (2):179-224 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In interpretations of the "Transcendental Aesthetic" section of the first Critique, there is a widespread tendency to present Kant as establishing that the representation of space is a condition for individuating or distinguishing objects, and to claim that it is on this basis that Kant establishes the apriority of this representation. The aim of this paper is to criticize this way of interpreting the "Aesthetic," and to defend an alternative interpretation. On this alternative, questions about the formation of the representation of space figure more centrally, and the anti-Leibnizian character of Kant 's argument can be properly appreciated



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant, Herbart and Riemann.Erik C. Banks - 2005 - Kant Studien 96 (2):208-234.
Hegel on Space: A Critique of Kant's Transcendental Philosophy.Scott Jenkins - 2010 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (4):326-355.
Kant on Construction, Apriority, and the Moral Relevance of Universalization.Timothy Rosenkoetter - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (6):1143-1174.
Experimental Philosophy and Apriority.Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa - 2014 - In Al Casullo & Josh Thurow (eds.), The a Priori in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 45-66.
Kant's inaugural dissertation and early writings on space.Immanuel Kant - 1929 - Westport, Conn.: Hyperion Press. Edited by John Handyside.


Added to PP

550 (#31,563)

6 months
22 (#118,559)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Warren
University of California, Berkeley

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references